Emile of rousseau7/7/2023 ![]() ![]() One consequence is that she is less worried than Rousseau about the imagination wandering without external constrains, because she believes in reason’s ability to guide the imagination by choosing its objects. This close affinity has several consequences. It is argued that contrary to what is often assumed, Wollstonecraft’s conception of the imagination is not primarily characterized by its Romantic features, but rather by the close affinity she posits between reason and the imagination. ![]() Whereas Rousseau characterizes reason as a derivative faculty, grounded in the more primary faculty of perfectibility, Wollstonecraft perceives reason as the faculty defining human nature. ![]() These differences are grounded in their different views on the faculty of reason and its relation to the passions. It is argued that though Wollstonecraft was evidently influenced by Rousseau, there are significant differences between their views. The article compares Rousseau’s and Wollstonecraft’s views on the imagination. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |